Some legal problems involve a policy, product, billing practice, or data practice that may reach beyond one person.
This page shares only what public team materials and public filings support. It does not treat a filing as proof, a result, or a promise that a similar case is available.
A public filing can show what a case is about. It cannot decide your situation.
Public cases can help explain the kind of question involved. They do not prove liability, a settlement, a recovery, class certification, current representation, or that another person has the same legal path.
Before a matter is accepted, the firm confirms the right practice, attorney, jurisdiction, conflicts, scope, and next step.
02 Matters in the public record
Read the public record with care.
01
Public complaint / California federal court
Garcia et al. v. Roblox Corporation
A public 2025 complaint identifies Morgan D. Ross and Robert B. Salgado as counsel for plaintiffs and a putative class in proposed privacy claims. Public reporting later described an arbitration development. This page treats the filing as public procedural context, not a result or promise of representation.
Zebraline Group, LLC et al. v. OpenAI, L.P. et al.
A public docket lists Morgan D. Ross and Robert B. Salgado for the plaintiffs and shows arbitration, stay, and dismissal steps. This is a public-record reference only. It is not a result, a current-representation statement, or a statement of liability.
Public reporting describes a proposed class action filed in San Diego Superior Court. The complaint alleges that patient conversations were recorded with an ambient AI documentation tool without required notice or consent. Reporting identifies Robert B. Salgado as counsel for the plaintiff. These are allegations in a pending matter, not findings or a result.
No promise of representation, eligibility, availability, or a particular result.
No statement that a filing establishes liability, certification, recovery, settlement, or current case status.
No claim that a public matter makes another person’s legal question the same.
04 Source discipline
Public team materials identify a complex-civil perspective; public records give that perspective a careful boundary.
Current Counterpoint team materials describe consumer protection, complex civil, class action, mass tort, and multi-jurisdictional experience. That material explains the public team profile. It does not promise future scope or availability.